As I always say all betting systems are equally worthless so flying by the seat of your pants is just as good as flat betting over the long term. When I said the probability of losing 8 hands in a row is 1 in 173 I meant that starting with the next hand the probability of losing 8 in a row is 1 in 173.

If you are dealt three consecutive hands, what is the chance that they will all lose, excluding ties? You have about a 14 percent chance of losing three hands in a row when you play blackjack. Most players probably guess 1 percent because they figure the chance of this. Probability Of Losing 5 Blackjack Hands In A Row, big fish casino friends, art-slot uit categorie 4, poker hand rankings printable Crazy Money 2 The best option for Australian Players is Fair Go because of the excellent services the online casino provides to its players and the fact that it is especially targeted to Aussie players. Dealer Final Hand Probability Odds. This next table shows the odds of what the dealer's final hand will be. Usually in blackjack, the dealer must hit on 16 and stand on 17. These rules are slightly different for other variations of twenty-one. So generally, the odds of the dealer's final score being 16 are 0% because he must hit.

Years ago in some blackjack book I read that in a 24 hour period of playing blackjack, you should have one losing streak of 10 hands or more.
I know I have had at least 4 streaks of over 20 hands and the last one came very recently. I played a whole shoe with 2 other players and did not win a single hand but had two pushes. Figuring about 240 hards dealt to 4 of us, including the dealer, at 2.7 cards per hand, I get about 11 cards per round, so approximately 22 rounds. So lost 20, pushed 2. Next shoe I lose the first 6 and finally win a hand. So give or take a hand or so, lost 26 without winning one. That first shoe was one that went just slightly positive and just stayed there, but I have had long losing streaks on highly positive shoes and those can be very expensive. The thing is the evening turned out positive when it was over and during the day of 3 of my 4 worst streaks I ended up instead of down.
The thing is, in order to be a lifetime winner at counting, you must have the gut to go through these kind of streaks and not lose confidence, especially when the evil streak hits you with big bets out there.
So if you are in a decent size casino with the tables busy, I would guess that there will be one or more people at any time going through what you just went through.
ihate17

By Ion Saliu, Founder of Blackjack Mathematics

I. Fundamental Probability Issue: True Odds at Blackjack, Software Calculator
II. Fundamental Myth of Blackjack Gambling: Counting Cards
III. Theory of Streaks: Foundation of Blackjack Gambling Strategy, Systems
IV. Blackjack Resources, Software, Systems, Basic Strategy Cards (Color Charts)

1. The Fundamental Probability Issue: True Blackjack Odds - New Software Calculator

First captured by the WayBack Machine (web.archive.org) on November 21, 2002.

They say roulette is the queen of casino games. Then, blackjack is the king of the casino. Many believe that Blackjack, or 21, or twenty-one is the most popular casino game in the world. Blackjack is also the most researched game ever. It is also the only casino game with fluctuating odds (or probability). The winning chance changes with the composition of the deck. This is more about blackjack mathematics than anything else.
For gambling is such a mathematical phenomenon that the casinos would do .. you know what to you .. if you knew well about it! This casino game is so easy to win .. but it is NOT about card counting! In truth, card counting at blackjack lopsidedly serves the greedy interests of the casinos.
The blackjack player is honestly served only by the Fundamental Formula of Gambling (FFG). And thus the casino henchmen will threaten you if you simply write down in a notebook what you lost and what you won. Hey, that's a tax requirement in any jurisdiction!

Let me start by saying that the game of blackjack has caused me the most serious problems with casinos and gambling developers/authors/system vendors. Blackjack or Twenty-one (seen the movie 21?) is the most popular casino game and the most researched one. There are plenty of books dedicated to the so-called mathematics of blackjack.

There is worthiness in a few of such books or eBooks. For the most part, however, there isn't much mathematics in all those blackjack studies. The heart of the matter is a worthless concept known as card counting.

I do have a strong interest in blackjack. It is well documented at my website. As a matter of fact, I consider myself the best blackjack player ever. As Muhammad Ali put: 'It ain't bragging if you back it!' So, I put the money where my mouth is: I issued a casino gambling challenge, especially at the blackjack tables. So far, nobody has dared to honor my challenge. The real casino challenge is open to any gambler, gambling author, or gambling system developer — card-counting or not.

I wrote a book about the true mathematics of blackjack, insofar as precise probability calculations are concerned. You might be shocked to hear, but the mathematical truth is that your knowledge of blackjack probabilities or odds is dead wrong. Everything you had known was based on guesswork, albeit it educated guesswork.

To this date, the blackjack odds are the same as John Scarne calculated them in the 1950s. The computers were not the commodity they are today. And John Scarne was not a computer programmer! The way he calculated the odds made sense for the first two and three blackjack cards in a round. I quote from his 'Scarne's New Complete Guide to Gambling' (pg. 363):

'We find that the dealer's first two cards can produce the counts from 2 to 21 in 1,326 ways.'

Indeed, Combinations C (52, 2) = 1,326 two-card blackjack hands (combinations of 52 cards taken 2 at a time). That is the only thing.. half-way mathematically correct! The truly correct method applies the mathematics of combinatorics alright. But instead of the numerical sets known as combinations, we must apply the mathematics of arrangements. The combinations represent boxed arrangements. In this case, C (52, 2) = (52 * 51) / 2 = 1,326. Arrangements A (52, 2) = (52 * 51) = 2,652 — or double the amount of combinations. Hence, we played cute and said half-true for the blackjack combinations case!

In the case of the first 2-card hands, the combinations-generating method greatly simplifies the problem at no additional cost. 10-7 is equivalent to 7-10. The problem comes to life beginning with 3-card hands. A hand like 10-6-7 is not equivalent to 10-7-6: Dealer must stop at 10-7.

'We'll discover that we need to know, however, and avoid most of the fractions, if we multiply 1,326 x 169 to get a common multiple of 224,094.'

Now, that's a big mystery! How did Scarne come up with that 169 factor??? Well, that's what they call an educated guess, or guesstimation! John Scarne didn't have a clue, mathematically speaking. He has never explained how he came up with that 169, kind of a new number of the beast! (There are 13 cards in each of the 4 suits in blackjack; 13 to the power of 2 equals 169.. what's the relation?!)

In order to calculate the probability precisely, we must generate all the elements (blackjack hands) in lexicographical order. Nobody even knows how many hands are possible, as their size varies widely: From two cards to 10 cards (for one deck)! When two or more decks are employed, the blackjack hands can go from two cards to 11 cards.

Of course, there is a lot of blackjack software out there! But all that software belongs to the simulation category! That is, the blackjack hands are dealt randomly. Based on the well-known-by-now Ion Saliu's Paradox, random generation does not generate all possible combinations, as some elements repeat. So, we can never calculate the probability precisely based on random generation. If there are 334,490,044 total possible complete hands in blackjack, only 63% will be unique and 37% will be repeats — if we randomly generate 334,490,044 hands.

I rolled up my sleeves again. I had started years ago a blackjack pro

By Ion Saliu, Founder of Blackjack Mathematics

I. Fundamental Probability Issue: True Odds at Blackjack, Software CalculatorII. Fundamental Myth of Blackjack Gambling: Counting CardsIII. Theory of Streaks: Foundation of Blackjack Gambling Strategy, SystemsIV. Blackjack Resources, Software, Systems, Basic Strategy Cards (Color Charts)

1. The Fundamental Probability Issue: True Blackjack Odds - New Software Calculator

I. Fundamental Probability Issue: True Odds at Blackjack, Software Calculator
II. Fundamental Myth of Blackjack Gambling: Counting Cards
III. Theory of Streaks: Foundation of Blackjack Gambling Strategy, Systems
IV. Blackjack Resources, Software, Systems, Basic Strategy Cards (Color Charts)

Odds Of Losing 7 Blackjack Hands In A Row